Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| news:2025:0901_we-have-elms [2026/02/23 00:04] – Richard White | news:2025:0901_we-have-elms [2026/04/03 19:48] (current) – Richard White | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== | + | ====== 1 Sep 2025: We have elms! ====== |
| - | We finished our tree inventory at today' | + | We finished our tree inventory at today' |
| - | We are now fairly sure that the the scrubby stuff which we had previously dismissed as a form of birch is actually **elm** (//Ulmus// sp.) | + | |
| - | It appears that the identification of elms is a complex business, with botanists disagreeing over how many species (and hybrids) there actually are. | + | |
| - | To give you an idea of the problem, I've downloaded a couple of elm identification guides and added them to our [[lib: | + | |
| - | Although our elms are shrubby growths, clustered around the north-east corner of the pond and apparently suckering, | + | Although our elms are shrubby growths, clustered around the north-east corner of the pond and apparently suckering, |
| - | we have found one or two in good locations where they can be encouraged to grow larger. | + | |
| - | However, we do not expect them to reach the stature of the elms of the English countryside before Dutch Elm Disease decimated them, | + | |
| - | and they may not be the same species as those. | + | |
| ==== More news items ==== | ==== More news items ==== | ||
| - | {{blog> | + | {{blog> |
| + | |||
| + | ** | ||